Peer Review Process

The journal runs a systematic review process considering the appropriate technique to ensure the quality, validity, and contribution of each manuscript to the field of education. It follows a rigorous, double-blind peer review process that maintain academic standards.

 

The overview of the review process includes:

1. Initial Submission & Editorial Screening

Upon submission, the editorial team conducts an initial screening to assess the manuscript's fit with the journal's focus and scope, as well as to ensure that the submission adheres to the journal’s formatting and ethical guidelines.

2. Double-Blind Peer Review

In this process, both the authors and reviewers remain anonymous to ensure unbiased evaluation. The manuscript is sent to at least two independent expert reviewers who specialize in the subject area.

3. Reviewer Evaluation

Reviewers assess the manuscript on several key aspects, including:

• Originality and significance of the research
• Methodological rigor
• Clarity and coherence of the argument
• Contribution to theory, research, or practice in applied education
• Relevance and applicability to the field of education Reviewers provide detailed feedback, highlighting strengths, areas for improvement, and any concerns.

4. Review Outcomes

Based on the reviewers’ reports, the manuscript can receive one of the following decisions:

• Accept: The manuscript is ready for publication with minor or no revisions.
• Minor Revisions: The manuscript is generally strong but requires minor adjustments, which the authors must address before publication.
• Major Revisions: The manuscript has potential but requires significant improvements. Authors are invited to revise and resubmit the manuscript for another round of review.
• Reject: The manuscript does not meet the journal's standards and is unlikely to be suitable for publication, even after revision.

5. Revision and Resubmission

If revisions are requested, authors are given the opportunity to address the reviewers’ comments and improve their manuscript. Revised manuscripts are typically sent back to the original reviewers for reassessment to ensure that the necessary changes have been made.

6. Final Decision

After the peer review and revision process is complete, the editor makes the final decision based on the reviewers’ recommendations and the quality of the revised manuscript. Authors are notified of the decision and provided with further instructions for the publication process if the manuscript is accepted.

7. Publication

Accepted manuscripts undergo final editorial checks, copyediting, and formatting before being published in the journal’s upcoming issue. The journal publishes online ensuring wide accessibility to its readership.

 

Throughout the process, authors are kept informed of the status of their manuscript and are encouraged to engage with reviewers’ feedback to strengthen their work.