Journal of Applied Educational Study

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2025): August
Articles

Digital and Botanical Literacy Profiles for Sustainability: A Study on Biology Students

PDF: 19-33
  • Dinar Anggarani,
  • Murni Sapta Sari,
  • Sulisetijono Sulisetijono
Dinar Anggarani
Universitas Negeri Malang
Murni Sapta Sari
Universitas Negeri Malang
Sulisetijono Sulisetijono
Universitas Negeri Malang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64460/jaes.v1i3.107

Published 30-08-2025

Keywords

  • Digital literacy,
  • botanical literacy,
  • science education,
  • sustainability,
  • learning

How to Cite

Anggarani, D. ., Sari, M. S., & Sulisetijono, S. (2025). Digital and Botanical Literacy Profiles for Sustainability: A Study on Biology Students. Journal of Applied Educational Study, 1(3), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.64460/jaes.v1i3.107

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Applied Educational Study

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

Higher education plays a crucial role in promoting sustainability, particularly in establishing professional individuals who able to apply sustainable knowledge and ideas. The awareness of the importance of botany is hampered by student's low interest and knowledge about plants. The low relationship between botany and humans is an obstacle in achieving sustainable development. Digital literacy plays an important role in increasing botanical literacy conversely. ICT technology can help increase botanical literacy and reduce the level of plant awareness disparity due to digital literacy serves access to extensive botanical information and online interaction. This research method is quantitative and qualitative method with survey to biology students and interview with botanical lecturers at several universities in Malang, East Java. The research instrument consists digital literacy questionnaire refers to Carretero et al. (2017), botanical literacy test refers to Uno (2009) level model, and interview guidelines and survey about botanical learning in higher education. The data analysis used is quantitative and qualitative descriptive analysis. The findings suggest that digital literacy among students in Malang Raya is generally adequate but varies by aspect, with particularly weaknesses in information and data literacy. Group A shows the highest botanical literacy across all levels, though lower multidimensional scores highlight challenges in applying this knowledge broadly. Integrating digital and botanical literacies through project-based learning and meaningful assignments can enhance engagement and support students' understanding of sustainability issues. Future research should focus on designing and evaluating innovative curriculum models that integrate botanical literacy with digital technology to foster student engagement and sustainability awareness.

PDF: 19-33

References

  1. Adams, R., Martin, S., & Boom, K. (2018). University culture and sustainability: Designing and implementing an enabling framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 434–445.
  2. Adinugraha, F. (2022). An approach to local wisdom and cultural in Biology learning. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference of Education and Science, ICES 2021, November 17-18, 2021, Jakarta, Indonesia.
  3. Ahrends, A., Rahbek, C., Bulling, M. T., Burgess, N. D., Platts, P. J., Lovett, J. C., Kindemba, V. W., Owen, N., Sallu, A. N., Marshall, A. R., Mhoro, B. E., Fanning, E., & Marchant, R. (2011). Conservation and the botanist effect. Biological Conservation, 144(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.08.008
  4. Al Muhdhar, M. H. I., Rohman, F., Tamalene, M. N., Nadra, W. S., Daud, A., & Irsyadi, H. (2019). Local wisdom-based conservation ethics of tabaru traditional community on halmahera island, indonesia. International Journal of Conservation Science, 10(3), 533–542.
  5. Aleixo, A. M., Leal, S., & Azeiteiro, U. M. (2021). Higher education students’ perceptions of sustainable development in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129429
  6. Amprazis, A., & Papadopoulou, P. (2020). Plant blindness: a faddish research interest or a substantive impediment to achieve sustainable development goals? In Environmental Education Research (Vol. 26, Issue 8, pp. 1065–1087). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1768225
  7. Balding, M., & Williams, K. J. H. (2016). Plant blindness and the implications for plant conservation. Conservation Biology, 30(6), 1192–1199. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12738
  8. Beasley, K. (2023). Indigenous Knowledge Sharing and Botanical Literacies in Early Childhood Education. International Journal of Early Childhood Environmental Education, 10(2), 21.
  9. Beasley, K., Hesterman, S., & Lee-Hammond, L. (2023). Reviving botany in the curriculum: the botanical journey of two Western Australian early childhood teachers. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 39(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1017/aee.2022.42
  10. Beasley, K., Lee-Hammond, L., & Hesterman, S. (2021). A Framework for Supporting the Development of Botanical Literacies in Early Childhood Education. International Journal of Early Childhood, 53(2), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13158-021-00291-x
  11. Børresen, S. T., Ulimboka, R., Nyahongo, J., Ranke, P. S., Skjaervø, G. R., & Røskaft, E. (2023). The role of education in biodiversity conservation: Can knowledge and understanding alter locals’ views and attitudes towards ecosystem services? Environmental Education Research, 29(1), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2022.2117796
  12. Bowcutt, F., & Caulkins, T. (2020). Co-teaching Botany and History: an interdisciplinary model for a more inclusive curriculum. Isis, 111(3), 614–622.
  13. Buchholz, B. A., DeHart, J., & Moorman, G. (2020). Digital citizenship during a global pandemic: Moving beyond digital literacy. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 64(1), 11–17.
  14. Burke, R., Sherwood, O. L., Clune, S., Carroll, R., McCabe, P. F., Kane, A., & Kacprzyk, J. (2022). Botanical boom: A new opportunity to promote the public appreciation of botany. Plants People Planet, 4(4), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10257
  15. Carretero, S., Vuorikari, R., & Punie, Y. (2017). EUR 28558 EN The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens With eight proficiency levels and examples of use. https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC106281
  16. Chan, B. S. K. (2017). Digital Literacy Learning In Higher Education Through Digital Storytelling Approach. In Journal of International Education Research (Vol. 13, Issue 1). http://rubistar.4teachers.org/
  17. Chien, Y. C., Su, Y. N., Wu, T. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2019). Enhancing students’ botanical learning by using augmented reality. Universal Access in the Information Society, 18(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-017-0590-4
  18. Chow, A. S.-Y., Jim, C.-Y., & Lee, J. C.-K. (2022). Education for sustainable development. Soft Skills and Hard Values: Meeting Education’s 21st Century Challenges.
  19. Cil, E. (2016). Instructional integration of disciplines for promoting children’s positive attitudes towards plants. Journal of Biological Education, 50(4), 366–383.
  20. Clémençon, R. (2021). Is sustainable development bad for global biodiversity conservation? Global Sustainability, 4. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2021.14
  21. Cohen, R., Parmentier, A., Melo, G., Sahu, G., Annamalai, A., Chi, S., Clokie, T., Farrag, A., Naik, A., Naseem, S., Sakhuja, S., Wang, J., Clausi, R., & Santin, A. (2020). Digital Literacy for Secondary School Students: Using Computer Technology to Educate about Credibility of Content Online. Creative Education, 11(05), 674–692. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2020.115050
  22. Colon, J., Tiernan, N., Oliphant, S., Shirajee, A., Flickinger, J., Liu, H., Francisco-Ortega, J., & McCartney, M. (2020). Bringing botany into focus: addressing plant blindness in undergraduates through an immersive botanical experience. BioScience, 70(10), 887–900.
  23. Damico, J. S., Panos, A., & Myers, M. (2018). Digital literacies and climate change: Exploring reliability and truth (s) with pre-service teachers. In Best practices in teaching digital literacies (pp. 93–107). Emerald Publishing Limited.
  24. Dimon, R., Pettit, L., Cheung, C., & Quinnell, R. (2019). Promoting botanical literacy with a mobile application - CampusFlora - using an interdisciplinary, student-as-partners approach. International Journal for Students as Partners, 3(2), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.15173/ijsap.v3i2.3671
  25. Hemingway, C., Dahl, W., Haufler, C., & Stuessy, C. (2011). Building botanical literacy. In Science (Vol. 331, Issue 6024, pp. 1535–1536). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1196979
  26. Jose, S. B., Wu, C. H., & Kamoun, S. (2019). Overcoming plant blindness in science, education, and society. Plants People Planet, 1(3), 169–172. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.51
  27. Kahar, A. P. (2018). Analisis Literasi Digital Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi Melalui Proyek Video Amatir Berbasis Potensi Lokal pada Mata Kuliah Ekologi Tumbuhan. J. Pedagogi Hayati, 2(1).
  28. Kemenkominfo. (2022). Status Literasi Digital di Indonesia 2022. Kominfo, November, 205–207. https://www.c2es.org/content/renewable-energy/
  29. Kimani, B. (2024). Effectiveness of Project-Based Learning in Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills among High School Students. American Journal of Education and Practice, 8(2), 54–65.
  30. Kizi, Z. M. V. (2024). EXPLORING FOREIGN EXPERIENCES IN TEACHING BOTANY: INSIGHTS AND INNOVATIONS. European International Journal of Pedagogics, 4(04), 37–41.
  31. Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2022). Project-Based Learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (3rd ed., pp. 72–92). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.1017/9781108888295.006
  32. Le, B., Lawrie, G. A., & Wang, J. T. H. (2022). Student Self-perception on Digital Literacy in STEM Blended Learning Environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(3), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-022-09956-1
  33. Lukitasari, M., Murtafiah, W., Ramdiah, S., Hasan, R., & Sukri, A. (2022). Constructing Digital Literacy Instrument and its Effect on College Students’ Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 15(2), 171–188. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15210a
  34. Napal, M., Mendióroz-Lacambra, A. M., & Peñalva, A. (2020). Sustainability teaching tools in the digital age. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083366
  35. Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers and Education, 59(3), 1065–1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016
  36. Nugroho, C., & Nasionalita, K. (2020). Digital Literacy Index of Teenagers in Indonesia. Journal Pekommas, 5(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.30818/jpkm.2020.2050210
  37. Pangrazio, L., Godhe, A. L., & Ledesma, A. G. L. (2020). What is digital literacy? A comparative review of publications across three language contexts. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(6), 442–459. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020946291
  38. Pany, P. (2014). Students’ interest in useful plants: A potential key to counteract plant blindness. Plant Science Bulletin, 60(1), 18–27.
  39. Parsley, K. M. (2020a). Plant awareness disparity: A case for renaming plant blindness. Plants People Planet, 2(6), 598–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10153
  40. Parsley, K. M. (2020b). Plant awareness disparity: A case for renaming plant blindness. Plants People Planet, 2(6), 598–601. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10153
  41. Pedrera, O., Ortega-Lasuen, U., Ruiz-González, A., Díez, J. R., & Barrutia, O. (2023). Branches of plant blindness and their relationship with biodiversity conceptualisation among secondary students. Journal of Biological Education, 57(3), 566–591.
  42. Peiffer, H., Schmidt, I., Ellwart, T., & Ulfert, A.-S. (2020). 8 Digital Competences in the Workplace: Theory, Terminology, and Training. 3, 5(4), 11–12.
  43. Perdana, R., Yani, R., Jumadi, J., & Rosana, D. (2019). Assessing students’ digital literacy skill in senior high school Yogyakarta. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 8(2), 169–177.
  44. Pettit, L., Pye, M., Wang, X., & Quinnell, R. (2014a). Designing a bespoke App to address Botanical literacy in the undergraduate science curriculum and beyond. http://eflora.library.usyd.edu.au/
  45. Pettit, L., Pye, M., Wang, X., & Quinnell, R. (2014b). Designing a bespoke App to address Botanical literacy in the undergraduate science curriculum and beyond. Proceedings of ASCILITE 2014 - Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Tertiary Education, 614–619. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84955319433&partnerID=40&md5=0032bc89fc7611284b8288f976728b6c
  46. Pongsophon, P., & Jituafua, A. (2021). Developing and Assessing Learning Progression for Botanical Literacy Using Rasch Analysis. Science Education International, 32(2), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i2.5
  47. Priyatni, E. T., & As’ari, A. R. (2019). Project-Based Learning Paper: Learning Model To Develop 4cs (Critical and Creative Thinking, Collaboration and Communication Skills).
  48. Radovanović, D., Holst, C., Banerjee Belur, S., Srivastava, R., Vivien Houngbonon, G., Le Quentrec, E., Miliza, J., Winkler, A. S., & Noll, J. (2020a). Digital literacy key performance indicators for sustainable development. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2587
  49. Radovanović, D., Holst, C., Banerjee Belur, S., Srivastava, R., Vivien Houngbonon, G., Le Quentrec, E., Miliza, J., Winkler, A. S., & Noll, J. (2020b). Digital literacy key performance indicators for sustainable development. Social Inclusion, 8(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v8i2.2587
  50. Reddy, P., Sharma, B., & Chaudhary, K. (2020). Digital literacy: A review of literature. International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), 11(2), 65–94.
  51. Reimers, F. M. (2021). Education and Climate Change International Explorations in Outdoor and Environmental Education. Springer. http://www.springer.com/series/11799
  52. Sá, M. J., Santos, A. I., Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2021). Digital Literacy in Digital Society 5.0: Some Challenges. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0033
  53. Sanders, D. L., Ryken, A. E., & Stewart, K. (2018). Navigating nature, culture and education in contemporary botanic gardens. Environmental Education Research, 24(8), 1077–1084.
  54. Saputra, M., & Siddiq, I. H. Al. (2020). Social Media and Digital Citizenship: The Urgency of Digital Literacy in The Middle of A Disrupted Society Era. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 15(07 SE-Short Papers), 156–161. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i07.13239
  55. Sari, M. S., Sri Sulasmi, E., Biologi, J., & Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, F. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Terhadap Keterampilan Literasi Botani Calon Guru Biologi. In Online (Vol. 9, Issue 2). http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jpb
  56. Sari, M. S., Sudrajat, A. K., & Hassan, Z. bin. (2023). Scientific writing skills activity: A strategy for empowering botanical literacy. Biosfer, 16(2), 312–322. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.28282
  57. Shrivastava, P., Stafford Smith, M., O’Brien, K., & Zsolnai, L. (2020). Transforming Sustainability Science to Generate Positive Social and Environmental Change Globally. In One Earth (Vol. 2, Issue 4, pp. 329–340). Cell Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2020.04.010
  58. Sriyati, S., Septiani, F., Udayani, H., & Sera, K. (2021). Local wisdom-based teaching materials to improve student problem-solving. Jurnal Bioedukatika, 9(2).
  59. Stroud, S., Fennell, M., Mitchley, J., Lydon, S., Peacock, J., & Bacon, K. L. (2022a). The botanical education extinction and the fall of plant awareness. Ecology and Evolution, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9019
  60. Stroud, S., Fennell, M., Mitchley, J., Lydon, S., Peacock, J., & Bacon, K. L. (2022b). The botanical education extinction and the fall of plant awareness. Ecology and Evolution, 12(7), e9019.
  61. Ulfert-Blank, A. S., & Schmidt, I. (2022). Assessing digital self-efficacy: Review and scale development. Computers and Education, 191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104626
  62. Uno, G. E. (2009). Botanical literacy: What and how should students learn about plants? American Journal of Botany, 96(10), 1753–1759. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900025
  63. Van Luong, P., & Hong Van, V. (2021). Education Responsibility Protection Environmental For Students: Duties, Requirements And Necessity. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Business and Government, 27(1), 2021. https://cibg.org.au/
  64. Ward, J. R., Clarke, H. D., & Horton, J. L. (2014). Effects of a research-infused botanical curriculum on undergraduates’ content knowledge, STEM competencies, and attitudes toward plant sciences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 387–396.
  65. Wulandari, S., Sunandar, A., & Setiadi, A. E. (2023). The Plant Blindness Profile of Secondary School Students. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(3), 502–510. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i3.65315
  66. Youssef, A. Ben, Dahmani, M., & Ragni, L. (2022). ICT Use, Digital Skills and Students’ Academic Performance: Exploring the Digital Divide. Information (Switzerland), 13(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/info13030129
  67. Yustina, Syafii, W., & Vebrianto, R. (2020). The effects of blended learning and project-based learning on pre-service biology teachers’ creative thinking skills through online learning in the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24706
  68. Žalėnienė, I., & Pereira, P. (2021). Higher Education For Sustainability: A Global Perspective. Geography and Sustainability, 2(2), 99–106. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2021.05.001
  69. Zhu, B., Parsley, K. M., Griscom, H. P., Wallace, L. E., Castellano, R., Gonzalez, R., Ospina, D., & McCartney, M. (2024). Connecting plant science education in undergraduate life science courses to plant awareness disparity, Vision and Change, and sustainability careers. Journal of Biological Education, 1–15.
  70. Zidny, R., & Eilks, I. (2020). Integrating perspectives from indigenous knowledge and Western science in secondary and higher chemistry learning to contribute to sustainability education. Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy, 16, 100229.